March 2 2012 Corrected an error by removing "don't" from 10th line so that it reads:  "... also becuase I believe a pro-life organization should be trying to work itself out of a job...", and corrected other minor errors I happened to note.

I wonder why these people have not worked themselves out of a job yet? 

Jack Ames, Defend Life, Balto. Md.

As regards Jack Ames and Defend Life in particular, I sent the Justice Department emails that I received from DefendLife giving me directives on what to carry out on their database, which was a falsification in my opinion because I was not working for them, never received training or instruction about their database, nor was it even a remote possibility that I would ever do work for them.  And this is not only because I have my own organization and there's plenty of real work to do that would actually end abortion rather than this drumming up business, but also because I (corrected, removed "don't") believe a pro-life organization should be trying to work itself out of a job instead of becoming the H&R Block of the pro-life movement where given Obama is elected, now per Jack Ames we have to redouble our efforts and even pay people to do even more work.  Man!  People make money on abortion, even the pro-life movement!  What would so many people who get money for doing pro-life work be doing if they weren't doing that?! 

I have not been able to do much with this site for a couple of years now because I became physically disabled, but I just got another one of those emails, this time it was an invitation to a potluck for volunteers, and DefendLife knew to take me off their database a couple of years ago when we had words and then I filed that federal complaint against them, and I'm still on their mailing list and being referred to as a volunteer.  If someone tells you to buzz off, why is it so hard to let go?  Why is it necessary to make everyone think it isn't so?  I wasn't then and am not now a volunteer for DefendLife.  I only act on my own behalf and my own organization, and I haven't been able to even keep up with my own website.  But DefendLife is making work for me because I have to make sure that my website is up to date at least about this so that when people see it, they don't think it's just dated and now Jack Ames and I are friendly again.  I avoid him and others in the pro-life movement because he's anything but a friend to me, or the pro-life movement, in my opinion.  No one who needs to falsify that I work for him on paper is capable of friendship, nor of overturning abortion.  I always wondered why people exaggerated about the less fair aspects pro-choicers when what they were doing spoke for itself.  It was not necessary to embellish.  Real pro-lifers don't need to lie.

Anna Maria Agolli wrote this on December 28, 2011, The Feast of the Holy Innocents, in honor of the children who gave their lives so Christ could do the same to redeem us all.

On March 8, 2012, Jack Ames was STILL sending me his emails.  What does it take to get him to understand I want nothing to do with him!  It's bad press for me.  Edited on 3/9/2012

SBA (Susan B. Anthony List) for CyberStalking that I reported after enduring it for so long, and they're still doing it.  Had to come to the library to make this change even though I'm disabled, because they won't leave me alone.  Will be posting proof of that when I'm able, but reported them to IC3, FBI WFO, FBI soc-UScert, and FTC.  They won't knock it off out of Christian Charity because the purpose of putting me on their email list after I told them many times to take me off, is to show that I'm part of their endeavor, and they support Bishop Loverde.  I am not part of their list, I can't get them to take me off, they won't do it and no authority is forcing them.  They just keep harassing me.  May 3 2015.

Missy Smith, WakeUp, DC

Bill Simpson, Maryland March for Life

and

Anyone who thinks Fr. Frank Pavone, Director, Priests4Life, should not have to speak out on and explain the details of his having been banned from Arlington Diocese by Bishop Loverde for using graphic signs, etc.

NEWEST ADDITION TO NOT ASSOCIATED WITH:

Brian Burch of the Catholic Vote.  Being Catholic is a privilege, not something you ram down someone's throat because then the rammer's catholicism is just the manner selected to be violent.  When people name drop, they want to be associated with that name or are impressed by it.  When people do it even though they've been told to do otherwise, they want to drag down the name they're dropping to their own level.  I got email from Brian Burch after a long lull of not receiving and I noticed that I was re-subscribed as of September 2011. I kept asking him the IP address of the person who subscribed me (likely Jack Ames, or Bill Simpson or someone like that possibly given my past experiences with these persons) and he would not respond.  Finally I sent him quite a few emails about that so he couldn't help but notice and although I told him to take me off his list and even threatened legal action given he wouldn't respond about the IP address, he continues to send me his garbage.  And that's what it is when it's coming from Brian Burch.  I have nothing to do with Brian Burch and am looking to take legal action against him or whatever can be done to address what seems to be harassment, etc.  I made this entry on May 25 2012, and amended it May 31 2012, putting aside what I need to do instead, and I am disabled and not able to deal with malicious behavior for its own sake, but I had to insure my reputation is not slurred or marred by association with the likes of Brian Burch at the Catholic Vote.  If one wants to be associated with Catholicism, it IS a privilege, and this behavior is anything but Catholic.  As a Catholic who is Pro Life, I know.

Carol Anderson

More coming on this issue soon.

Malicious Websites with which I have no connection: 

milesfrommaybe with a dot com after it.  Also, Feast of the Innocents.

I don't type it like a website is normally typed so that clicking on it in error is impossible.

It has trojans and viruses that will steal your passwords and other private information from your computer, besides ruining your computer.  If you have good virus protection, your software should block you, but I wouldn't take the chance because I don't understand enough about it.  I was able to look at the cached version of the site and it is a mix of jibberish about the feast of the holy innocents and happens to contain my name and my site in it too. 

This is an ongoing list to which I add only when I encounter the information and have time to post it.

The Pro-Life Movement would benefit from hanging together, but not if doing so side-steps the presumed and stated purpose. It's not a social club, after all.

Going to an abortion clinic every Saturday or to the March for Life every year is NOT about meeting your friends and being together while ignoring a possible solution that is a gift God put right under our noses but we just don't like the wrapping. 

If you're that lonely and need such occasions to be able to socialize, please, please ... find some other outlet.

Because if you really don't believe abortion and injustice should come to an end, if you have predispositions that put the end of abortion at less than first, it's better that you don't show up. 

Or you might give the wrong impression to someone who would otherwise learn from an authentic supporter of the right to life for all by saying or doing something that transparently contradicts a true pro-life attitude.

Getting arrested in some demonstration doesn't automatically make you pro-life nor is it automatically or necessarily effective.  You have to use your already-extent pro-life attitude (i.e., your Gospel-based behavior in all matters and your integrated character) to figure that out.

So please don't use it for togetherness, if for no other reason, out of respect for those who endure injustice, including those entering abortion clinics via their mothers' stomachs and then never coming back out.